Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 16:52

Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Caitlin Clark's Teammate Sends Official 'Warning' To WNBA Referees - Yahoo Sports
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How Can Anyone Keep Up in the Hamptons? - The Cut
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why am I so tired of seeing homeless people all over the place?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Google, Meta and Snap think this tech is the next big thing - CNN
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
‘Bravely Default: Flying Fairy HD Remaster’ Review: Not Exactly HD - Forbes
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.